"The only time the owners are responsible for the dog's action is when the dog is used as a weapon," Bramnick explained, adding that the family's only recourse is to sue the dog owners for monetary damages. Two weeks ago, Assembly Minority Leader Jon Bramnick told New Jersey 101.5's Steve Trevelise that it's unlikely the owners would be criminally charged. A neighbor called police who picked up the dogs and brought them to police headquarters, where they were returned to their owners. 23, borough spokesman Jon Salonis told New Jersey 101.5. She said there was one incident of the dogs running loose but the dogs did not show any aggressive tendencies.
Again, this decision is based upon the facts and evidence known to law enforcement at this time," Ciccone said. Thus, despite the well-intended demands for justice, no charges will presently be filed. "In this case, based upon the information known at this time, it would appear as if no law has been violated.
Based upon information received, no previous violent incidents involving the animals in question has been conveyed to law enforcement," Ciccone, a former Superior Court judge, says in the letter. "There has been no intentional, knowing, or reckless criminal conduct uncovered. The prosecutor, however, did send a letter dated March 23 to "concerned citizens" who have contacted her office, explaining that no criminal conduct has been identified. At a vigil on Sunday night in front of the family's home, Oma Morgan, a co-worker of the boy's father, told NJ.com that Ciccone has not spoken to the family.
0 kommentar(er)
